The immediate appeal of George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead”, what makes it sizzle, is in the utilitarian crudeness of its technique in practicing practical filmmaking despite a poverty of resources rather than a dearth of ideas. The story of a mass rising of the dead to feast on the living is entirely the beneficiary of the fly-on-the-wall immediacy that occurs through a fortunate collision of crummy technical resources and blind enthusiasm; it has the feel of documentarian news footage so commonplace on television in the time before news coverage actually meant a cinéma vérité coverage of events rather than pristinely staged roundtables of waxen talking heads. Simply put: the filmmakers didn’t know enough not to do what they went ahead and did anyway.
To read the complete review, click the following link to: https://chandlerswainreviews.wordpress.com/the-concession-stand-quick-snack-reviews/
Very wise take on “Night of the Living Dead”. Somehow–even with cheap production values, black and white photography and spotty acting–Romero captured a verisimilitude that still impresses, 46 years later.
Speaking of acting, I think your remark as to the difference between bad acting and non-performance is insightful. Not sure how many of us would behave in the midst of an apocalypse, but I bet we wouldn’t be ourselves. Abstracted, disturbed, detached, hysterical…but definitely not normal or ordinary.
Keep up the fine work…